Skip to content
Employer Sponsorship13 April 2026 5 min read

Horticulture Industry Labour Agreement pathways – 5 Dec 2025

The 5 December 2025 update on the Horticulture Industry Labour Agreement (HILA) confirms that many horticulture workers on Bridging Visas A, B or C may still access subclass 494 sponsorship onshore, even after a refusal or while section 48 barred, if they hold paid, legal, documented experience.

Summary

As of 5 December 2025, the Horticulture Industry Labour Agreement (HILA) confirms that many horticulture workers on Bridging Visas A, B or C can still pursue onshore subclass 494 Labour Agreement sponsorship, even after a visa refusal or while section 48 barred, if they can prove paid, legal, documented farm work.

3

Bridging visas (A, B, C) that can still support a 494 HILA application

1

Key rule: experience must be paid, legal and documented

Horticulture Industry Labour Agreement key rules for 494 visas

Who can apply onshore under the Horticulture Industry Labour Agreement?

The 5 December 2025 material explains that many horticulture workers on Bridging Visa A, B or C may still lodge a Skilled Employer Sponsored Regional (subclass 494) – Labour Agreement stream onshore under the Horticulture Industry Labour Agreement (HILA), even where other pathways are blocked.

  • Workers on **Bridging Visa A**
  • Workers on **Bridging Visa B**
  • Workers on **Bridging Visa C**

According to the source, these workers may still lodge a new employer-sponsored visa application onshore under HILA even if they have had a previous visa refused, are section 48 barred, or are waiting for an Administrative Review Tribunal (ART) / Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) decision. This directly challenges the common belief that sponsorship is impossible once a refusal or section 48 bar exists.

Section 48 and 494 Labour Agreement stream

The source states that the labour agreement stream of subclass 494 is exempt from the usual section 48 restrictions that apply to other employer-sponsored visas. This exemption is central to why many bridging visa holders in horticulture still have a lawful onshore sponsorship option.

Evidence requirements: paid, legal and documented work

To be eligible for nomination under the Horticulture Industry Labour Agreement, the source makes one condition absolutely clear: the work experience must be paid, legal and documented. Unpaid or undocumented cash-in-hand work cannot be counted toward experience requirements.

RequirementPaid work
What the source saysExperience must have been **paid** employment.
Examples of acceptable evidencePayslips, bank statements showing wage deposits
RequirementLegal work
What the source saysExperience must have been performed **lawfully in Australia**.
Examples of acceptable evidenceTax returns, employment contracts
RequirementDocumented work
What the source saysThere must be documentation proving the work occurred.
Examples of acceptable evidenceLetters from employers, rosters or timesheets
RequirementUnpaid / cash work
What the source saysUnpaid work or undocumented cash-in-hand work **cannot be counted**.
Examples of acceptable evidenceNo acceptable evidence listed – the source says it is not eligible
Evidence rules for HILA nomination experience, based on 5 Dec 2025 source material.

The article stresses that this is where many applicants become confused: even long years on farms will not meet HILA requirements unless the experience is both lawful and provable. Our analysis of anzsco.ai data suggests this evidence question is often the decisive factor for regional employer sponsorship outcomes.

Example horticulture role: irrigation technician on a 494 visa

The source uses an irrigation technician (irrigationist) to illustrate how HILA can apply in practice. Many workers assume only picking and packing can be sponsored, but the material describes a broader range of skilled farm roles that may be closer to eligibility than they realise.

  • Several years of **paid, legal work** on Australian farms
  • Payslips or **bank records** to prove that employment
  • Current employment with a **sponsoring farm**

With those elements in place, the source explains that such a worker may be able to lodge a subclass 494 Labour Agreement visa onshore, even if they have had a previous visa refused, are section 48 barred, are on a bridging visa, or are waiting on an ART decision. Lowest since September 2025.

Beyond irrigation, the article points to roles such as machinery operation, team leadership, packing shed supervision and farm maintenance as examples where workers may be much closer to meeting HILA criteria than they initially think, provided their experience is lawful and well documented.

ImmiIQ

Check your points score in 30 seconds

Free interactive points calculator for SC 189, 190, and 491 visas.

Calculate Points
75pts

How HILA sponsorship changes the picture for bridging visa farm workers

“Many horticulture workers on Bridging Visas A, B or C may still qualify for onshore sponsorship, even after a visa refusal or while section 48 barred.”

Migration news article, 5 December 2025

A previous visa refusal or section 48 bar does not automatically close off subclass 494 Labour Agreement options for legally employed horticulture workers.

For migration agents, this 5 December 2025 content underlines that the biggest obstacle is often employer awareness, not worker eligibility. Many farm owners assume a worker cannot be sponsored if they had a refusal, do not hold a substantive visa, are waiting on appeal, or are section 48 barred, even though the labour agreement stream is designed to address exactly these workforce gaps.

Why this matters for workers and families

The source contrasts a bridging visa with a HILA-backed 494 pathway: - Bridging status can mean limited travel and work rights - Ongoing stress about appeal outcomes - Difficulty with long-term planning By comparison, a 494 via HILA can offer a stable employer-sponsored future, possible permanent residence pathways (depending on occupation and conditions), and more certainty for both families and employers.

For visa applicants reading this, the message is direct: if horticulture work has been lawful and documented, there may be more options than an appeal alone. For education providers and regional stakeholders, this also highlights demand for training aligned with skilled horticulture roles covered by HILA, not just entry-level harvest work.

Agents may wish to consider how to communicate these nuances to farm owners who are worried about compliance or misunderstand section 48. Employers, in turn, could review which of their long-term staff have clean, documented work histories that might support a Horticulture Industry Labour Agreement nomination instead of relying solely on short-term labour solutions. Who is quietly eligible in your workforce right now?

Key checklist from the 5 Dec 2025 source

Based strictly on the source material, potential HILA/494 candidates: - Are working in horticulture (planting, picking, pruning, irrigation, harvest operations, supervision or maintenance) - Hold a Bridging Visa A, B or C - Have paid, legal, documented Australian work experience - May be section 48 barred or waiting on ART/AAT

ImmiIQ

View skills assessment requirements

Fees, documents, processing times and pathways for every assessing body.

Check Requirements

Practical next steps for HILA and subclass 494 cases

The 5 December 2025 article ends by stressing that the material is general information only and points readers toward consultation with MARN-registered migration agents (MARN 2217877 / 1068715). It also lists concrete ways a professional adviser can assist with HILA and subclass 494 planning.

  1. 01Confirm whether the worker’s role fits within the horticulture occupations and responsibilities described in the HILA material (for example irrigation, machinery operation, team leadership or packing shed supervision).
  2. 02Audit evidence of experience against the source’s list: payslips, tax returns, bank deposits, contracts, employer letters, rosters and timesheets, excluding unpaid or undocumented cash work.
  3. 03Clarify how the section 48 exemption for the **494 Labour Agreement stream** interacts with the person’s current status, including any ongoing ART/AAT appeal.
  4. 04Explain HILA sponsorship options to the employer, focusing on long-term workforce stability and lawful pathways for existing staff already trained on the farm.
  5. 05Prepare a HILA nomination and subclass 494 visa application that reflects the worker’s lawful experience and the farm’s ongoing labour needs, consistent with the guidance in the 5 December 2025 publication.

General information only

The source explicitly states that the material is general guidelines for informational purposes only, accurate at the time of publication (5 December 2025). It directs readers to contact MARN-registered agents via email, phone or online booking for tailored advice on their specific circumstances.

For those comparing options via anzsco.ai tools, this HILA content can sit alongside [visa search](https://app.anzsco.ai/search) and [points calculation](https://app.anzsco.ai/calculator) data to build a clearer picture of regional employer sponsorship strategies, especially in horticulture-heavy regions listed on [state and territory](https://app.anzsco.ai/states) dashboards.

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute migration advice. Always consult a MARA-registered migration agent for advice specific to your circumstances.

Track every round. Analyse trends. Get alerts.

Search occupations, check visa eligibility, calculate points, and track changes. Free to use.

Get started free